Chapter 303
“Let the Rome Treaty Organization initiate the relocation elsewhere. It might be worthwhile for the Rome Treaty Organization to lead the formation of a new African nation.”
Those kinds should be scattered.
We must eliminate all the savage cannibals who have shown that true reform is impossible, especially the ones who previously served Belgium. We need to reduce their numbers as much as possible. I’ve thought about South Africa, but honestly, it’s not really viable.
It seems that it would only lead to even greater racial discrimination in the future.
“If we’re talking about relocation, then South Africa is out of the question. So what about…”
“South Africa should accept yellow people now, but given its nature, it’s unlikely to accept black people.”
Rather than trying to fix South Africa, it would be better to separate black people from the start.
So, what should we do with the real cannibals? Relocation alone has its limits.
I wish Hitler would resolve that issue as well. Wait a second…
A brilliant idea just came to me.
Of course, there are places to relocate them. For example…
“How about relocating them to South America?”
There are plenty of places to send them in South America.
Like Brazil, Argentina, Chile, Uruguay, Paraguay. We can just send them all over there.
“South America, you say?”
“Yes. If we provide support to South American countries, let’s propose this to each country.”
We should definitely maximize relocation within Africa, but we need to think differently.
Do you think cannibals will easily discard their past customs?
We need to kill off as many as possible and scatter them so that cannibalism itself becomes impossible.
If they had enough food and shelter from the start, things would change. If any Congolese resist, we can leave civilization to the well-regarded Belgians.
“The U.S. might perceive our approach as an advance into South America.”
Uh, I’m not too worried about that.
There isn’t really a need to restrict our proposals to just South America.
“Well, we’re not directly approaching militarily. But just in case, let’s also propose to the U.S.”
We’ll propose to both North and South America.
With this level of proposal, the U.S. probably won’t react strongly.
Since the U.S. has been a major buyer of various packages from us, they aren’t in a position to refuse such proposals.
“I understand.”
De-colonization of Africa must be accomplished.
“They may propose conditions in return.”
“Dealing with cannibals wouldn’t be bad. If their conditions threaten our territory, then either I or Prime Minister Churchill will handle it.”
Right. Argentina might be a bit of a concern.
I’ve heard that the First Lady, Eva Perón, is somewhat scandalous, but she’s also quite a remarkable woman. I don’t know about the other countries, but Argentina could respond.
If they make demands beyond what is necessary, we may have to negotiate with other countries. After all, this issue will be resolved at the headquarters of the Rome Treaty Organization.
“This is about computers.”
The next agenda item was computers.
After the war, developments in recent years have been rapidly increasing.
“While we need to keep developing weapons, the day will come when computers are used in those weapons. Please hasten the development of computers at the Roman Department of Science and Technology.”
The Roman Department of Science and Technology.
This technical development department was established after the Rome Treaty Organization was formed, mobilizing scientists from various countries, located in Russia.
“Yes, regarding computer development, but actually, there are some issues.”
What now? What else is the problem?
Isn’t Doctor Tesla in charge of the computers? Ah, wait a minute. No way, right? Is Tesla involved?
“You mean Doctor Tesla? Why?”
Is it possible that Tesla has died? Could it be?
Honestly, it wouldn’t be surprising if he died at any moment, but what if he just left us like that?
“No, it’s just that one scientist under Tesla is the problem.”
“Who is it?”
Does Tesla’s laboratory have a renowned figure? I know almost nothing about computer development.
“In the Tesla Computer Research Institute, prominent scientists like Alan Turing and John von Neumann are the hands and feet that work alongside Tesla.”
Hmm, Alan Turing, John von Neumann.
I mentally repeat their names, trying to pull out knowledge buried in the back of my mind.
“But?”
Those are names I haven’t heard before.
It seems like my knowledge is lacking. But what is the problem with them?
They appear to be computer scientists, but if I’m aware of that, wouldn’t I have to be a genius about everything?
“Alan Turing from the UK is apparently a homosexual. Is it okay to entrust computer development to someone like that?”
A homosexual.
Given the name, they’re likely from the U.S. or Britain, probably a member of the Rome Treaty Organization, so it’s likely Britain.
I didn’t know such a figure existed. If he’s a computer scientist, well, he might be useful. But he could also be someone who died young.
In those times, homosexuality was illegal, so maybe that’s why I haven’t heard of this person. Or maybe I’m just unaware.
“Is his ability guaranteed?”
“Yes. The institute recognizes his abilities, and they don’t regard his homosexuality as much of a flaw. The problem is that homosexuality is illegal in Britain.”
Homosexuality illegal in Britain? Ah, well, it makes sense for Britain, but what about Russia?
Is it illegal in Russia, too? But…?
I remember seeing a meme about a Russian skinhead doing physiotherapy on a gay person.
So, would it also be illegal in Russia? Though, I know that during the Soviet era, it was suppressed.
“Is it currently illegal in our Russia, too?”
If it’s illegal, should we change the laws?
Honestly, given the current situation, I’d really like to keep computer scientists as they are.
We need to synthesize technology and develop faster than the original history, yet we seem to still be working on transistors.
“No. The anti-homosexual laws from the old Tsarist times have been abolished, and regardless of societal attitudes, it’s currently not illegal.”
In that case, it doesn’t matter.
After all, we’re in Moscow. Not in Britain but in Russia.
“I see. Then, isn’t there a problem?”
“It seems Britain wants to expel Alan Turing from the institute, deeming him a disgrace to the British Empire.”
Oh my, it seems like someone is planning to export talent overseas like in Hell Joseon.
I personally don’t hold a good view of homosexuality either.
Melting the Arctic and torturing polar bears does sound interesting, but at least in this era, it stands out poorly when a notable figure does it.
However, designating it as illegal, separate from that, isn’t the right way to go.
Just let people mix freely as they please.
“Are you really saying to not like women, even if you were to die soon?”
“Yes.”
How unfortunate. If he desired, we could provide him with a woman. Hmmm, but that might be the case for me too.
I hear there are still those trying to match me with the British Empire in London. It’s sad, but what can one do if that’s what he wants?
In that case, it would be more reasonable to change nationalities.
“We cannot discard exceptional talent due to homosexuality. Let’s naturalize him as a Russian. Since the Rome Treaty binds us all, it shouldn’t be an issue.”
After all, it’s just wordplay.
It’s merely that Alan Turing has moved from a region where homosexuality is illegal under the Rome Treaty to a place where it isn’t. That’s all.
“Yes. Understood.”
It’s regrettable, but I guess I’ll turn a blind eye. It’s a pity that such talented individuals should have children.
After all, there’d be no children from a homosexual relationship.
I’m quite disappointed about that. Truly, from exceptional talents, it would be best if they could have children to pass on their abilities.
—
During this time, the nations of America, including North America, received proposals from the Rome Treaty Organization to accept the relocation of black people from Congo conditioned on technology transfer and military modernization.
Among those, the U.S., which is like the rightful owner of America, looked at the proposal and thought, “Really?”
Especially since MacArthur was negative about the Rome Treaty proposal.
“Hey, Ike. Do you think this makes any sense?”
“We have enough technology now. Plus, since the KFC incident, the status of black people isn’t very good. Adding cannibals to the mix? That’s a bit much.”
This was unacceptable.
Even while trying to enact new laws regarding black people and trying to embrace them, there was already an uproar with accusations about favoring the red-black individuals.
The KKK was already causing trouble, and MacArthur was planning to run for president, needing to be careful about public opinion.
The Rome Treaty must be aware of MacArthur’s situation. Therefore, there’s likely some other reason behind their proposal.
“Are they essentially targeting Central and South America? Is there a possibility that the Rome Treaty could dabble there?”
“Right now, even letting go of old colonies is a challenging task. They likely made this suggestion without much thought, as a way to clarify that there’s no misunderstanding.”
Of course. That would make sense.
Just suggesting the relocation of blacks to South America means that after the decolonization of Africa, the governmental relocation process won’t proceed smoothly.
Especially since only recently there were incidents where black people attempted to terrorize Prime Minister Donau. In that case, it might be better to wait and see.
“Then, let’s politely refuse for now and monitor the situation in South America.”
“Yes. I will do that.”
MacArthur recalled the previous meeting with Anastasia.
During their meeting, she had clearly said this:
“-So that’s why we need more. It’s good for us to make money. And the U.S. would have a justifiable reason to intervene, right? Since the U.S. is all about democracy, there needs to be a legitimate reason to intervene, right?”
A justifiable reason to intervene.
Although this differed somewhat from the original topic, the Rome Treaty was choosing Central and South America to deal with the black population.
I wonder if South America will accept it. Isn’t the Saint of Death trying to provide the U.S. with a motive for intervention?
That thought crossed my mind suddenly.
In that case, perhaps simply observing for now might be a good approach.
Indeed, these moves from the Rome Treaty sparked various reactions from the individual countries in South America.
Most felt it necessary to maintain good relations with the Rome Treaty, yet they couldn’t accept cannibalistic black people. That was the crux of their stance.
After all, asking to accept black cannibals is unreasonable. Who knows what kind of unrest they might cause domestically?
Even if that’s not the case, with America’s recent focus on South America, it’s hard to find a country willing to get close to the Rome Treaty while potentially displeasing the U.S.
After all, the Rome Treaty is far away, while the U.S. is close at hand.
However, there was a country that found the Rome Treaty’s proposal appealing: Argentina.
During this period, Argentina was under the leadership of President Juan Perón and his wife, Eva Perón, who were both enjoying great popularity.
Yet, out of the blue, the Rome Treaty suggested relocating black people to Argentina.
Though it claimed to be a proposal from the Rome Treaty, it essentially stemmed from the Russians, so Juan Perón had to consider the proposition seriously.
“The Rome Treaty has made such a proposal? Hmm, what do you think, my dear?”
“If we want to counter Brazil and become the dominant force in South America, accepting the Rome Treaty’s proposal might be a good move.”
Now, Argentina’s dream was to become the dominant power in South America.
This dream was influenced by the recent Great War.
After reunification, North America, having captured Japan, emerged as a superpower, while Europe unified and resurrected Rome under the dominance of Russia, thus becoming a superpower or even more.
Although they hadn’t participated in that war and had no direct involvement, the inspiration was enough.
They aspired to unify South America!
“Hmm, but accepting blacks is a bit… But.”
The weapons from the Rome Treaty, or more accurately, Russian weapons, are considered among the best in the world.
If they could arm themselves with such weapons, they could surely defeat Brazil.
But asking them to accept black immigrants? Wouldn’t that mean they want to educate them and have them stay in Argentina?
That sounds like they want to make them Argentinian citizens entirely.
“Well, I can’t say that’s entirely wrong.”
“They (the Romans) say that once they migrate to Argentina, what to do next is up to them.”
“Hmm, but we can’t just go around killing them all.”
Forget everything else, we’re talking about cannibals. You want us to take in cannibals?
Wouldn’t they cause an enormous amount of trouble?
“Let’s do this: the Falkland Islands. We can propose to return them to us.”
“The Falklands?”
Why is that suddenly coming into the conversation?
“If we are really concerned about the blacks, we can request their return and dump all the blacks on the Falklands. It’s a secondary matter anyway.”
“Will Britain agree to that?”
I doubt they will accept it.
“After the recent European war, there are virtually no British soldiers left in the Falklands. If they’re already unable to exert influence, how about requesting that together?”
Requesting the Falkland Islands could be a reasonable condition if it could be accomplished.
It’s certainly better than not receiving anything at all. If we agree to stuff all the blacks there, we could use that to persuade them to return the islands.
“But they are bound by the Rome Treaty? Wouldn’t that be difficult?”
In reality, Juan Perón didn’t hold high expectations.
After all, it’s Britain. Alongside Russia, Britain is one of the strongest nations in Europe under the Rome Treaty Organization.
They relinquished much land after World War II, but would they easily give up the Falklands?
Even if they say they have only a few defenders, that doesn’t mean Britain is full of fools who can’t defend a single island.
If Russia decides that they dislike Britain, they won’t give up the Falklands either.
“Of course, that’s just a pretext.”
“The U.S. has recently extended its influence in South America; we are also among its targets. Should we ask for the Falklands before the U.S. moves quickly and personally head to Moscow to negotiate?”
“Directly to Moscow?”
Are you suggesting we go all the way to Moscow over this issue?
If we’re going to travel, wouldn’t it be better to head to the headquarters of the Rome Treaty Organization?
“Yes. The empress Anastasia of Russia is someone I respect personally as a fellow woman. And isn’t the core of the Rome Treaty ultimately in Moscow?”
“Is that merely your personal wish?”
Eva Perón is a figure much adored by the public.
It’s natural that she would focus on someone like Anastasia, a fellow female leader.
“Furthermore, wouldn’t it be wise to resolve this black migration issue and what concerns the Falklands? Even if we can’t secure the Falklands, maintaining good relations with the Rome Treaty isn’t a bad idea.”
The United States has already begun to establish influence over Mexico and Central America.
At this rate, it won’t be long before their reach extends to Argentina.
If we can involve the Rome Treaty, we can keep the Americans in check. Then, Argentina’s safety will be guaranteed, and we can build our basis for dominance in South America later.
Eva Perón decided to use the black immigration and the Falklands as a basis for strengthening ties with the Rome Treaty.
“Hmm, let’s go with that.”
Yes. Juan Perón wanted to meet with her at least once to see just how extraordinary a woman she was, the one who unified Europe.