American Tax Officer

Thus, Peristedan's suggestion to focus on the voters is indeed a good strategy to break the shackles right at their root.

Phipps, an old hand in Congress, was naturally not dull-witted. He understood his confidant's point immediately and responded, "What you said makes sense. With the support of the Camora Family, we could indeed win over the support of most criminals in Los Angeles, but to move this bill, we still need more power..."

"Yes, that's why I think, Senator Phipps, you should leverage what you are best at and hold a debate about this bill on television to gain more approval ratings."

In America, participating in televised debates and criticizing certain policies or bills is a very common tactic.

By participating in television debates, politicians can present their viewpoints and talents on mainstream media, increasing their visibility and influence among the public.

Television debates are an important opportunity for politicians to show voters their policy positions, leadership abilities, and debating skills. During the debates, they can address the issues voters care most about and win their support and trust.

Besides, television debates not only showcase oneself but also serve as a platform to attack opponents. Politicians can incite negative sentiments among voters and weaken their opponents' approval ratings by criticizing their policies and behavior.

At the same time, television debates are crucial for shaping a politician's personal image. Through well-prepared speeches, powerful rebuttals, and confident demeanor, they can portray themselves as decisive, visionary, and capable leaders.

Through television debates, politicians can promote their political agendas and policy propositions to the public, garner understanding and support, and drive the formulation and implementation of related policies.

In short, participating in television debates is one of the key methods for American politicians to win voter support, increase their popularity, attack opponents, shape their image, and promote their political agendas. Discover stories with empire

Phipps's eyes brightened, and he replied, "Do you mean that I should challenge Director David to a television debate?"

"Exactly. This David, as the chosen one of the IRS's 'god-making' project and currently the spokesperson for the black tax bill, will make a huge blunder in front of the whole world during the television debate if he can't respond well. And if he dares not to come, the tough image he has built up will collapse. As his destroyer, Mr.

Phipps, his previous image and charm would naturally be transferred to you, and this will also bring you a boost in your approval ratings!"

With that said, Phipps slapped his thigh in excitement.

If it weren't for the fact that Peristedan was his confidant, he would have to admit that this strategy was indeed 'malicious'!

Firstly, if David refuses to come to the debate, it would certainly be a blow to the image he has built up so far.

After all, Americans admire heroes. Now that I have challenged you to battle, David, and you act the scaredy-cat instead, what would those who support you think?

But if he does come, all the better.

Although David has some skills, they are limited to catching criminals within the IRS system. But debating is a forte for any politician in America.

In America, all politicians must have good oratory skills to please and persuade voters to cast their votes for them.

Though Phipps's achievements may not be that great, his verbal skills – as an old hand in Congress – are his ace in the hole.

Over the years, how many opponents from rival parties have tried to campaign in California, only to be mercilessly rebutted by him in televised debates.

Now, David is just a newbie. In such a debate, won't he be played to death by me?

Thinking this, Phipps grinned and said, "What are we waiting for, issue the challenge at once!"

"Understood!"

Peristedan immediately turned and left.

Not long after, while everyone was still discussing last night's incident at the George Hotel, Phipps sent out a new tweet that blew up all over America.

The content of the tweet was nothing less than a direct challenge from Senator Phipps to Director David of the Western Suburb Branch to a television debate, and the content was extremely sharp, hardly shy of calling David a coward if he dared not show up.

"Oh my god, Senator Phipps is issuing a tactical challenge to Director David; the question is whether Director David dares to accept it!"

"Senator Phipps really is cunning. Isn't everyone aware that television debates are your politicians' show of strength? Using your own strong suit to challenge someone's weaker area, isn't that bullying?"

"It is a bit unfair, but since Director David is the spokesperson for the black tax bill and Senator Phipps is the critic, it makes sense for them to have a proper debate on television to defend their points of view."

"Whatever the case, there's going to be an interesting show to watch now."

"..."

The internet was abuzz, and while some netizens were just there for the spectacle, many also perceived the malevolence in Phipps's so-called debate challenge and started to rally to David's defense.

However, complaints aside, everyone knew that since Phipps had declared war so publicly, David had no choice but to face the challenge to dissolve the current situation.

Otherwise, if he were branded a coward for retreating, his approval ratings would inevitably plummet.